On 6 March 2012 17:57, Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Steven Dake wrote:
>
>> While the buffer is indeed allocated to a safe length, better safe then
>> sorry.
>
> Sure, but we aim for C89 compatibility so snprintf() isn't generally
> available - we would then need to provide an internal version for the
> inferior systems!
That's what I thought. But a quick rgrep and I find we use it all
over the place!
Alex
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2012-03-06