Subject: Re: spring cleaning step #1

Re: spring cleaning step #1

From: Alexander Lamaison <>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:44:51 +0100

On 17 April 2010 12:08, Daniel Stenberg <> wrote:
> I've converted LOTS of 'unsigned long' to 'size_t' where data/string lengths
> are dealt with internally. This is The Right Thing and it will help us make
> the transition to our size_t-polished API later on as well.

I notice also that you changed many non-size unsigned longs to ints.
What was the motivation for this? (I'm not suggesting its wrong -
just that my understanding of the practical implications of signed v
unsigned in C is hazy at best).

Received on 2010-04-17