Subject: Re: Q. on version numbers

Re: Q. on version numbers

From: Daniel Stenberg <>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:54:05 +0100 (CET)

On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Lawson wrote:

> I notice that the current stated version is 1.2.2, however when I actually
> install the library it calls itself Is this an oversight
> or is there a different meaning to the numbers?

Those are two fairly independent numbers. I found a lengthy description that
seems quite fine:

Received on 2010-01-26