Subject: Re: libssh2 gmake check failed

Re: libssh2 gmake check failed

From: Peter Stuge <>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 18:35:44 +0100

Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>> Thus, to me, it doesn't seem to be highly portable code
> I beg to differ.

I think you are talking past each other. The test case is not at all
portable, this is likely point.

> Perhaps a more productive way forward is to continue helping us
> improving what we have?

It is helpful - bugs in tests matter too. If noone can fix the test
(I can't) then I think it's better to take the test out.

Received on 2010-01-09